Posted on Jul 25, 2018 Leave a Comment
My inbox, and by extension my mind, is a torrent of tasks, requests, and reminders. The fog of busy is blinding. Occasionally a moment of clarity emerges, and I am able to write categories of tasks and to-do lists on what seems to be an endless stream of sticky notes. Some of those tasks get completed, some get pushed off, and others get doomed to oblivion as a detached and crumpled note at the bottom of my bag. Unfortunately, the awkward “I must have missed your email” or “sorry, I completely forgot” conversation has happened more than once. I need a better way to manage emails, dates, tasks, and reminders.
I am taking a journey into better productivity through the following six cross-platform applications: Airmail, Fantastical, Evernote, OmniFocus, Workflow, and IFTTT. Over the next several months, I will be purchasing, learning, integrating, and streamlining my workflow and will be documenting this journey.
There may be other applications that emerge as crucial components, but after a little research, these six applications will serve as essential productivity and workflow boosters.
So to start off, I am tackling my calendar system.
Like many, I either have little written in my Apple Calendar app and have work-related calendars through Google Calendar. The “let me check my calendar” statement doesn’t really work for me because even though I am busy, I have nothing written in my calendar. That needs to end.
Fantastical is an interconnected system that syncs with other applications like Apple, Google, and Microsoft calendars. The app not only reads the events and displays them together in one intuitive platform, but backward publishes new events from Fantastical to designated calendars. Adding an event is simple and intuitive in the Mac OS software. The software also provides the option of creating tasks directly in the Calendar that can be checked off. Unfortunately, these events are synced to other calendars, but not automatically to a task manager. This will take another step to be addressed through IFTTT, which I will explore in future postings.
Adding calendar events is simple and intuitive in the iPhone iOS, with an intelligent population of event data, times, and GPS from a simple typed line of text.
While numerous other features make this software powerful, Fantastical has an incredibly smart and easy way to capture events and data. And at the end of the day, power and ease are most important. When quickly planning an event or marking a task to be completed, it needs to be comfortable and quick. I don’t need to worry about populating sections of data. I want a smart application that knows how to fill in the useful information for me.
A major caveat of this powerful tool is the financial investment. The cost is steep, and if your workflow requires cross-platform applications, it is even more costly. The iPhone iOS application is 4.99, the iPad iOS application is 9.99, and the Mac OS application is a staggering 49.99. The latter has a 21-day free trial that might be worth checking out. The good news is that Flexibits, the software company who created Fantastical, offers a 20% discount for those in Education or Military service.
Whatever the case may be, the capturing of these dates, tasks, and reminders is well worth a 65 dollar investment, especially for ease of use and workflow.
*All images are screenshots of software or were created and/or edited by Jonathan Keck from personally owned stock images.
Posted on Jul 24, 2018 Leave a Comment
Personalized learning and technology create creators. A personalized approach to learning dictates less and provides space for the authentic voices and choices of students. Moreover, this approach naturally lends itself to making. Richard Culatta argues that technology affords this possibility in the education system. If used correctly, technology can create a learning environment where students can learn and create in ways that were otherwise impossible in a generation before (TED, 2013). The education system needs to adapt to this change lest they become irrelevant, or worse, an impediment, to real and useful education. The answer is not the mere presence of technology, but the proper use of this technology as an empowering tool in a new pedagogical paradigm.
Personalized learning is the future. One may shrug this pedagogical buzzword off as the latest fad destined to fade in a few years. The revolution of interconnected technology seems to suggest otherwise. There are many aspects of personalized learning. As a general principle, personalized learning is a reorientation of education toward individuals and not toward whole blocks of carbon-copy students. Instead of instructing students according to a predesigned plan, teachers create with their students a pathway of education that addresses their needs and interests. The implications of this approach have a transformative impact on all aspects of the educational structure. While there are numerous challenges personalized learning brings to the status quo, two significant factors are pacing and assessment.
Concerning the former, Basham, Hall, Carter, and Stahl (2016) explore learning and pacing in a personalized learning context. Through studying K-12 schools practicing different blended and personalized learning approaches, they concluded that the potential transformation of learning could result in tremendous improvements. Among twelve schools studied, 25% of students had achieved one full year of growth in math and reading by the middle of the school year (Basham, Hall, Carter, and Stahl, 2016, p. 130). Assessments, activities, and pacing were transformed to address the individual needs of students. Indeed, Culatta argues that a fixed pace and schedule of learning hampers student progress (TED, 2013). Personalized learning ought to allow for variability and individualized pacing. The challenge, however, is creating a class and school culture that can allow for such an educational environment. This shift transforms how a class looks and runs. Technology makes personalized learning much more efficient, and fostering a making culture in the classroom does so even more.
Personalized learning, variable pacing, and a classroom making culture require a shift in how teachers see assessments. Thomas Wanner and Edward Palmer (2015) explore personalized learning and its roll in blended and flipped classrooms. In particular, they focus on “flexible learning” through assessments. While studying flipped university classrooms, Wanner and Palmer concluded that students preferred “flexible assessments.” While assessments are often standardized and used as measurements of learning, these “flexible assessments” reflect a different purpose. In light of personalized learning, assessments function more as tools for learning and function best if they are customized, along with students, to measure student creation and choice (Wanner and Palmer, 2015, p. 357). Indeed, according to Culatta, one of the most significant challenges in the classroom today is that the educational system tends to treat all students the same (TED, 2013). Each student has different needs, learning gaps, and interests. To effectively reach each of these learners, a new approach to assessment is needed. Through a personalized learning approach, each student’s education is unique. In light of that, an assessment of that learning ought to be equally unique. Indeed, if students are encouraged to create and make according to their own needs and interests as they process the course’s content and themes, assessment becomes more a function of operability and skill, rather than rote memorization.
Technology is just a tool for learning. A real transformation would disrupt much, from streamlined grade books to uniform lesson plans for administrative oversight. Are teachers supposed to write twenty-five formal plans? What function do course periods have in this new reimagined learning system? If a student completes all work related to the course, do they move ahead to the next in the middle of the year? What resources are there for creating a making culture? If assessments shift to skill and creation, what form do finals take? Many other questions can and should be pondered. Personalized learning is disruptive, but perhaps it is the disruption needed to call into question the trite and tired response “We have always done it this way.”
References
Basham, J. D., Hall, T. E., Carter, R. A. , & Stahl, W. M. (2016). An operationalized understanding of personalized learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31 (3), 126-136.
TEDx. (2013, Jan 10). Richard Culatta: Reimagining learning [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=Z0uAuonMXrg
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers and Education 88, 354-369.
___________________________________________________________________
*Image credit: original picture purchased through Shutter Stock. Edited and redesigned by Jonathan Keck.
Posted on Jul 20, 2018 Leave a Comment
Just a year ago the President of the Catholic High School at which I work suggested that another colleague and I attend CUE Conference in Palm Springs. He was an old school advocate for technology, working with Apple to bring computers into the classroom in the late 80s and 90s. While the tech has changed, his advocacy hasn’t. When there wasn’t much of a budget, he pulled some strings and got us in.
This was my first encounter with an Ed Tech community beyond my own school walls. My twitter interactions were focused around personal interests and photos of food and cute goats (sorry cat people, hard pass). I discovered a vibrant ecosystem of teachers from all walks of life, from public Kindergarten to Carter Middle School. I even encountered a few other Catholic school teachers. There was electricity in the air. People were busy connecting and chatting, often for the first time face-to-face. They all seemed to know each other. There was some balled-guy and a Rabbi looking man that lots of people seemed to know and talk with—come to find out they were Matt “Ditch That Textbook” Miller and “The Tech Rabbi,” Michael Cohen. There were a lot of creative ideas on instruction, integration of Google in the classroom, and all sorts of inspirational things. It was without a doubt, drinking from a firehose.
Since then, I have connected with many of these teachers and practitioners on twitter and their blogs. I created an RSS feed of many Ed Tech influences via Feedly (a great RSS aggregator) and Unread (a clean and easy-to-read RSS reader for iOS). I marvel at how easy it is to connect and learn today. Personally, I am always looking for practical tips, strategies, teaching ideas, and tech integration. I find a lot of that on Twitter. Fellow teachers are providing creative ideas, workshops, Google tools, and all sorts of Ed Tech and Pedagogy resources. While I don’t have much to share yet, I love that I can take from one teacher, adapt or remix it, and share a repurposed version of it to another audience of teachers. Indeed, many of the teachers at my local school site look to me for inspiration. In turn, I find it from other teachers. Sharing our thoughts, strategies, and resources makes for a more speedy and robust transformation of education.
So, I, in turn, share some resources I have found helpful.
Here are a few helpful places to start in on the conversation with other Ed Tech practitioners. In particular, this list of top education RSS feeds and this top 10 education tech blogs are quite helpful. While I’m sure these aren’t comprehensive, the amount of experience, knowledge, and resources being freely shared online is incredible.
It might also be helpful to follow some of the top education hashtags on Twitter. They are as follows, but be sure to check out the full explanation of each Teach Thought.
#edchat #cpchat
#edtech #ntchat
#education #mlearning
#lrnchat #elearning
#edapp #engchat
#classroom #sschat
#teaching #mathchat
#playoutdoors #scichat
#edreform #artsed
#globaled #stem
Are there any hashtags or influencers that should be added to the list? Let us know in a comment below!
Posted on Jul 14, 2018 Leave a Comment
I am a creative by nature. I love well-designed art in all forms. And I especially love when quality and care is crafted into the classroom content. Perhaps the students don’t care if the teacher uses clip art on their handout or powerpoint, but I do. I love media-rich presentations created with care and attention to detail. I can design a speech, and I can develop a lesson, but I struggle with quality media.
I often turn to colleagues to create designs or background cutouts from images. While there are numerous applications and different kinds of software, the primary standard for graphic design is Adobe Photoshop. Indeed, the application software has trickled into our language just as “google” has. If you don’t know something, “google” it. If something looks off (or too perfect), they “photoshopped” it.
Just last year I had a friend create a picture of “thinking-man thinking about a thinking-man” for the cover of my Philosophy syllabus. I want this same skill to edit and create images, logos, and designed text in Photoshop. I believe command of this design software will translate into better work and more marketable skills.
To that end, I have decided to undertake a project of learning Adobe Photoshop through the use of only Youtube videos and discussion forums. There is a vibrant community of graphic artist in both of these social network spaces on the Internet. There are many posting “how to” videos for beginners all the way through advanced skills and practices. I will spend the next four weeks watching the following Graphic Artists’ youtube channels: Alec Markarian, Photoshop Tutorials, Spoon Graphics, PiXimperfect, and Flow Graphics, among others.
Adobe is now offering exciting options and bundles of apps at affordable prices on monthly payment plans. This has made many of their programs accessible to a whole new community. As of this post, I have successfully purchased, downloaded, and installed the software. My next steps will be watching more videos and walking-through editing and creating images. I plan on learning how to remove the backgrounds of several photos first. I then plan on learning how to create a few logos and graphics.
Posted on Jul 8, 2018 Leave a Comment
Context and Theory
All cultures emerge from influence, mixing, and remixing. Food culture is rife with examples of regional influences and transformations. Indeed, like all human activity, people have a desire to make good food—not only for themselves but for those around them. If there ever were a more consistent type of “making culture,” it would be food. Every culture uses both their traditions and resources to create a unique cuisine. However, resources change, and people migrate. There are many examples of how food has evolved and changed as a result of influence and transformation through “remixing.”
Sushi is a good example.
Like most food cultures, sushi, as we know it, has transformed through influences, demand, and responses to a crisis. Concerning the latter, sushi chefs began serving ground wasabi with raw fish during the Edo period. While the science was likely unknown, the root contains anti-microbial properties that reduced the risk of food poisoning. This practice was likely a response to movement of fish into the interior of Japan as demand for sushi increased. However, no doubt people developed a taste for it. Due to cost, most sushi restaurants do not serve real wasabi today, but rather a type of processed horseradish.
Remixing is adapting and innovating.
Moreover, much like sushi, education and teaching require the same process. Whether concerning technology or pedagogy, Good teaching “remixes” in response to not only inspiration but also need. By modeling new approaches to the curriculum, students will be inspired to embrace their own making and remixing.
This video is an example of how students might research a particular topic of their choice, find videos and images, and piece them together in a project.
How I did it.
After some research on the history of sushi, I visited both Vimeo and Prelinger Archives for film clips. After writing a script, I recorded the audio using a Blue Yeti USB Microphone and GarageBand. I then added the various clips and my audio to iMovie to edit the video and audio together. I removed the sound from the original clips, but saved the music from one of the clips as background music. I created the “Sushi Remix” text on a white background using Adobe Spark and used Lunapic to make that image have a transparent background. I then uploaded the image to my project and overlay it over some video.
What’s important to note here is that while I have used a few of these technologies here-and-there, I have never undertaken a large task like this before. Students would likely have the same experience that I had.
Portions of the video came from the following locations:
“My Japan” from the U.S. Treasury Department, c. 1945 — Public Domain
“The Fighting Tuna” — Public Domain Mark 1.0
“Authentic Japanese Sushi Experience” from Kim Laquindanum and Daniel Apolto — Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)
“Sushi Confidential Commercial” — Public Domain
“Sushi Tei 6th Anniversary // ‘a day in sushi tei’ by MYEL STUDIOS CINEMA — Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)
“Coffee Pot” by Headshot Studio — Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)
Music selection comes from “Authentic Japanese Sushi Experience” which originally derives from Andrew Applepie (Secrets, Wish You)